Manifest digest
ValidThe SHA-256 digest was recalculated from the downloaded manifest bytes.
ContentLedger verification
Verify ledger record
This page recalculates the stored origin-evidence manifest digest, checks its canonical serialization, and independently reviews its archive, version-chain, timestamp-proof, and digital-signature references.
Royal Windows vs. Renewal by Andersen vs. Pella: A Long Island Homeowner’s Guide
- Entry ID
urn:uuid:16e3e09d-ee37-4c2b-aca1-7ed3e674ee24- Manifest SHA-256
a874a9ead19fcc71e7f4161514e49434d258f0a48b3b5e65bdf7b3f80557aafc
Download canonical manifest Open Wayback snapshot View record JSON-LD
Verification results
Canonical JSON
ValidThe manifest matches the deterministic ContentLedger RFC 8785 serialization profile.
Archive snapshot
VerifiedThe associated Wayback URL passed the plugin’s HTTP availability check.
Version chain
ValidAny previous-manifest digest resolves to an earlier sealed record in this ledger.
Current content
Not availableLegacy records do not receive retroactive content-digest claims.
Site digital signature
Ed25519 compact JWS
Valid and currently authorizedThe JWS signature is cryptographically valid for this manifest digest, and its public key is currently authorized by the site's did:web document.
Verification methoddid:web:fireballnews.com#DjeLUjaodL9oX_rPJwua3boSmmsPTNx_6aEgA19HaPk
A valid signature associates the manifest digest with the displayed site-controlled key. It does not independently establish legal ownership, original authorship, or first publication.
Recorded artifacts
| Artifact | Status | Digest or location |
|---|---|---|
| Wayback Snapshot | Verified | https://web.archive.org/web/20260717032830/https://fireballnews.com/royal-windows-vs-renewal-by-andersen-vs-pella-a-long-island-homeowners-guide/ |
| Manifest | Sealed |
a874a9ead19fcc71e7f4161514e49434d258f0a48b3b5e65bdf7b3f80557aafc https://fireballnews.com/?wal_manifest=16e3e09d-ee37-4c2b-aca1-7ed3e674ee24
|
| OpenTimestamps proof | Bitcoin attested |
ece0d284874f4359ae252e6b80882c3608c73bb28c96486ce9386159fa92f69e Download .ots proof
|
| OpenTimestamps proof | Bitcoin attested |
1d1ebbccf02423f5aab377725aca473de7fb4aa78cfdef792a0f65eb44b22cb8 Download .ots proof
|
| OpenTimestamps proof | Bitcoin attested |
6b6ad32717924661bc8c797121c166e913eda5f55910fadf7645b5302e209697 Download .ots proof
|
| OpenTimestamps proof | Bitcoin attested |
8c4e2c64b6fd6e6c0f4a75c42dfbf3c50e5ada045d4717d74126b65392243114 Download .ots proof
|
| Ed25519 JWS signature | Verified |
a874a9ead19fcc71e7f4161514e49434d258f0a48b3b5e65bdf7b3f80557aafc Download compact JWS
|
Independent digest check
Download the canonical manifest without modifying it and calculate its SHA-256 digest with a local tool. The result must equal the manifest digest printed above.
sha256sum wp-contentledger-16e3e09d-ee37-4c2b-aca1-7ed3e674ee24.jsonAfter installing the official OpenTimestamps client, independently verify a downloaded proof against the manifest digest:
ots verify -d a874a9ead19fcc71e7f4161514e49434d258f0a48b3b5e65bdf7b3f80557aafc wp-contentledger-16e3e09d-ee37-4c2b-aca1-7ed3e674ee24-PROOF-ID.otsThe signature is an RFC 7515 compact JWS using the fully specified RFC 9864 Ed25519 algorithm and an RFC 8037 public JWK. An independent verifier should validate the JWS, confirm its manifestDigest claim equals the SHA-256 above, and resolve the kid against the published did:web document.